FREE SOLO TOOL
Find your next
valuable step.
Compare the value of doing work sooner with its relative size. Use Weighted Shortest Job First (WSJF) to build an order you can explain.
THE COMPARISON
Value + time criticality +
risk reduction / opportunity
Relative job size
Higher WSJF suggests considering a candidate sooner. Compare scores within the same set of work, using a consistent scale.
Candidates
1 / 50Your comparison stays in this browser. Make an edit to save it locally.
A CONSISTENT SCALE. A CONSIDERED ORDER.
Make the assumptions visible.
Compare a few candidates together. Pick a small reference candidate, then score the others relative to it. Use the same interpretation of each dimension across the whole list. The Fibonacci-style scale helps distinguish meaningful differences without pretending to precise measurement.
The first three dimensions form a relative cost of delay. Job size must be positive. These scores are comparisons, not money or estimates of elapsed time. Revisit them when your evidence or constraints change.
Read the SAFe WSJF method- User / business value
- How much does this improve the outcome for users or your business?
- Time criticality
- How much does waiting reduce value or threaten a real deadline?
- Risk reduction / opportunity
- How much risk does this reduce, or future opportunity does it enable?
- Job size
- How large is the work relative to the other candidates?
Your comparison, in your browser.
Candidate names, notes and scores are stored locally on this browser and are not submitted to Tellenze. There is no shared room or account sync. Other people using the same browser profile can see the saved comparison. Clearing browser storage removes it; private browsing may not keep it. Export a copy when you want to keep or share the result.